E-Mail
Print
tool name
closeThere's no doubt that the pair of apparently gold-mounted black onyx pendant earrings are old.
But there is doubt that they were ever owned by former first lady Mary Todd Lincoln.
Yet the Kentucky Historical Society, as part of the state's Abraham Lincoln bicentennial celebration, has been displaying and publicizing them as hers, going so far as to say on its Web site that "Mary Todd Lincoln prized these 'earbobs.'"
The earrings, each bearing hand-painted figures of a man and a woman, were purchased by the Historical Society in late 2008 for more than $19,000 through Heritage Auction Galleries in Dallas.
Historical Society Executive Director Kent Whitworth said that, in the society's best professional judgment, the earrings did once belong to Mary Todd Lincoln.
"We are thrilled with the acquisition of those earrings," he said.
But others aren't as sure about the earrings' authenticity.
Documents on file at the Historical Society that came with the earrings trace them back to well-known collector Charles F. Gunther of Chicago, who died in 1920. Gunther told the son of the man to whom he sold or traded the earrings that "he knew they were Mrs. Lincoln's earrings but he couldn't remember why he knew it," the son's daughter wrote in a letter in 1970 to another collector who had purchased the earrings from her family. The letter is among the documents in the Historical Society file.
"That's not much of a provenance," said Thomas Schwartz, director of research at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum in Springfield, Ill.
"They're similar to other kinds of jewelry that Mary bought, but I think that's about as far as you can go," said Schwartz, who is also the Illinois state historian.
He said that Gunther, a confectioner who collected many types of artifacts, some of which are now owned by the Chicago History Museum, had many fine things in his collection, but he also claimed to have skin shed by the serpent in the Garden of Eden.
Schwartz said more information connecting the earrings to Lexington native Mary Todd Lincoln is needed before it can be said the earrings once belonged to her.
"It's not enough that a collector has a hunch, especially if he can't even provide the person that he purchased it from," he said.
Some collectors buy on impulse, Schwartz added. "Their collecting passion overrides their common sense. They buy it hoping that in the future they'll be proven to be right in their instincts."
Gunther told Forest H. Sweet, the son of Forest G. Sweet, who obtained the earrings from Gunther, that he was sure the younger Sweet would live to prove that the earrings were Mary Todd Lincoln's, according to the letter from the younger Sweet's daughter, Julia Sweet Newman of Battle Creek, Mich.
Forest H. Sweet found as his proof a particular photograph of Mary Todd Lincoln wearing earrings. But she is not wearing the same pendant earrings in a photograph of her that accompanied the Historical Society's purchase.
That discrepancy was pointed out to Historical Society officials by a reporter, and the auction house through which the Historical Society bought the earrings has asked the family that owned the earrings at the time of the 2008 auction to look for the correct photograph. At the time of the 2008 sale, the earrings were in the estate of Dr. John K. Lattimer, who had purchased them from the Sweets through a dealer in 1968. Lattimer, a famous urologist who died in 2007, collected Lincoln artifacts.
Tom Slater, director of Heritage Auction Galleries' Americana department and supervisor of the sale through which the Historical Society bought the earrings, said Lattimer was disorganized in the last years of his life, and a lot of items in his collection that belonged together got separated. Slater said he suspects the correct photograph of Mary Todd Lincoln got separated from the earrings.
But, he said, "There's really absolutely no reason to question those earrings just because of the photograph."
@Nyx.replyAnswerText@