Massey goes on the offensive, criticizes MSHA in letter to governors

dhjalmarson@herald-leader.comJune 9, 2010 

Massey Energy chief Don Blankenship, embattled by safety questions after a West Virginia coal mine explosion killed 29 miners in April, went on the offensive this week. He sent four governors, including Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear, a letter claiming that federal coal mine regulators mandated an unsafe ventilation plan at mines such as Upper Big Branch in Montcoal, W.Va.

The company also claims that the Mine Safety and Health Administration doesn't allow coal dust scrubbers to be used on its continuous miner machines, allowing for a dangerous accumulation of dust.

Massey asked state agencies to review MSHA's policies.

"Ironically, perhaps the single biggest challenge to achieving safe mining is the current behavior of MSHA," the letter concludes.

MSHA and Kentucky's Energy and Environment Cabinet received the letter Tuesday and are reviewing it before responding, officials said.

The letter says MSHA saw success with a particular ventilation process in Pennsylvania, where coal seams contain high concentrations of methane. Longwall mines, which employ 1,000-foot-long machines that slice through coal and allow "gob" or waste to settle in the void behind, in Pennsylvania were able to encapsulate the methane in the gob and allow it to be siphoned off in a pipeline and sold.

Longwall mines such as Upper Big Branch in southern West Virginia and other regions work in seams with lower concentrations of methane, so putting the explosive gas in a pipeline isn't done. Such a ventilation plan forces the methane to remain in the mine and build up to explosive levels behind safety seals, Massey said.

Massey would rather use high-volume fans and less-circuitous curtain systems to quickly vent methane gas in those types of mines, the company said.

In his letter, Blankenship pointed to an Illinois coal company, Mach Mining, that challenged MSHA citations regarding its ventilation plan. Mach claimed MSHA's proposed changes, cited in September, were unsafe, but an administrative law judge agreed that MSHA's proposals took into consideration changing conditions at the mine. The judge's ruling is on appeal, Massey said.

"We've raised these issues with the federal agency before and not gotten any traction," Massey lawyer Shane Harvey said.

Changes to the Upper Big Branch mine's ventilation plan started in August and were finalized in March, Harvey said. The explosion happened on April 5.

"What you don't see in the records you're reviewing are the meetings where the engineers sit down and argue and fight and say we don't want to do this, and MSHA says well you have to if you want it approved," Harvey said. "What you're seeing is the end product where we've been basically forced to yield to their ventilation plan."

Blankenship's letter stopped short of saying the ventilation plan caused the Upper Big Branch explosion.

"Our investigation into the UBB accident is continuing. While we do not yet know the cause of the explosion, we have developed grave and serious concerns about the MSHA imposed ventilation system employed at UBB."

The company couldn't say Tuesday how many longwall mines in Kentucky were thought to be affected by similar ventilation plan changes.

Lexington Herald-Leader is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service