Record 10 teams banned from tourney over APR scores; UK teams clear

June 20, 2012 

  • Post-season bans

    Men's basketball teams banned from the 2013 NCAA Tournament because of subpar APR scores:

    Arkansas-Pine Bluff

    x-Cal State Bakersfield

    California-Riverside

    Connecticut

    Jacksonville State

    Mississippi Valley State

    North Carolina-Wilmington

    Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

    Toledo

    Towson

    x-Data still under review

INDIANAPOLIS — Poor academic scores could create a very different kind of madness in March.

A record 10 men's basketball teams, including three-time national champion Connecticut, will be banned from next season's NCAA Tournament because of subpar work in the classroom. UConn becomes the first BCS school to face a post-season ban in either of the two most prominent college sports based solely on the annual Academic Progress Rate scores, which were released Wednesday by the NCAA.

Each of the schools fell below the mandated cut line of 900 on their four-year scores. The APR measures the classroom performance of every Division I team. This year's data calculates rates from 2007-08 through 2010-11.

Joining the Huskies on the sideline next March will be Arkansas-Pine Bluff, California-Riverside, Cal State Bakersfield, Jacksonville State, Mississippi Valley State, North Carolina-Wilmington, Texas A&M-Corpus Christi, Toledo and Towson.

Mississippi Valley State was coached the past four years by former University of Kentucky Unforgettable Sean Woods, who has since been hired as head coach at Morehead State.

Cal State Bakersfield, which became a full-fledged Division I member in 2010-11 and does not yet have a conference affiliation in basketball, could be removed from the banned list because some its data is still being evaluated.

"I think if a (BCS school) didn't make it, it would look really bad," Ohio University professor David Ridpath said last week. Ridpath is also past president of the NCAA watchdog The Drake Group.

All the banned teams, including Connecticut, face additional sanctions of losing a minimum of four hours of practice time per week, which must be replaced by academic activities. The penalties could create an unusual scenario for the seven affected conferences.

Not only will UConn and the other teams be ineligible for NCAA play, but league officials could also rule them ineligible for the individual conference tournaments. If that happens, it could force changes in the tourney pairings.

Big East presidents have already said any team ineligible for the NCAA tourney will not be allowed to compete in conference tournaments, including UConn.

"We'll have to adjust the bracket accordingly," Big East associate commissioner for men's basketball Dan Gavitt said Wednesday, noting the Huskies could still win an appeal to the Committee on Academic Performance.

None of this came as a surprise to Connecticut, which had a four-year score of 889 and lost an appeal to the NCAA for a waiver that would have allowed it to play in next year's tourney. School officials contend that if the NCAA used the team's two most recent scores, 826 in 2009-10 and 978 in 2010-11, UConn's two-year score would be 902 and argued that school's self-imposed changes are already producing better academic results.

Other conferences face more uncertainty.

Two leagues, the Southwestern Athletic Conference and Colonial Athletic Association, each have two teams facing post-season bans. Four others — the Big West, Mid-American, Ohio Valley and Southland — all have one team on the list. They have not yet said what they will do with the ineligible teams.

But the penalties could have a significant impact.

"If there's one, two, three four different teams in any given conference, it would have a major impact in how the bracket, how the tournament is run, ticket sales, television exposure," Gavitt said "I think that's the goal of the presidents — to make the penalties more impactful, more meaningful."

NCAA rules allow each individual conference to determine how to award their automatic bid. In addition to banning ineligible teams from league tournament play, they could give the automatic bid to the regular-season champ or tourney runner-up if an ineligible team won the postseason tourney. Or they could forfeit the bid, which is the unlikeliest scenario.

Only three football teams received post-season bans — Hampton, North Carolina A&T and Texas Southern. All are members of the Football Championship Subdivision. The only other teams to get post-season bans were Central Connecticut State in men's soccer and Northern Colorado in men's wrestling.

In all, 54 teams fell below the 900 mark with roughly 80 percent (43) of them coming from what the NCAA defines as limited-resource schools.

The new four-year average of 973 represents a three-point increase over last year's report, and scores in each of the four most visible sports also went up. Baseball jumped six points to 965, men's basketball had a five-point increase to 950, while women's basketball (970) and football (948) both improved by two points.

UK teams above average

All 22 of the University of Kentucky's teams surpassed the NCAA cut score and 15 exceeded the national average for public universities in their sports.

The UK men's golf team led the way with a perfect 1,000 score, followed by women's cross country (994), men's cross country (993), women's golf (993) and women's tennis (992).

The Kentucky men's basketball (963), women's basketball (980) and football (951) teams were among the squads to beat the national averages.

None of UK's 22 teams have incurred a penalty during the nine-year history of the APR.

Lexington Herald-Leader is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service