'Hyde Park on Hudson': Bill Murray's tour de force

The Washington PostJanuary 3, 2013 

  • MOVIE REVIEW

    'Hyde Park on Hudson'

    

    R (brief sexuality). Focus Features. 1:35. Kentucky Theatre.

At first glance, choosing Bill Murray to play Franklin D. Roosevelt seems a blatant case of stunt casting. But within just a few minutes of Hyde Park on Hudson, it becomes clear that Murray makes an inspired choice, his ineffable combination of natural appeal and oddly recessive diffidence melding flawlessly with Roosevelt's own hidden depths.

What's more, the political capital Murray has earned with audiences over the years turns out to be crucial in this alternately charming and unsettling story, which transpires during a pivotal summer weekend in 1939, when Britain's King George VI visited FDR's Hudson Valley estate to gain the president's support in the coming war. That was also a time, the movie suggests, when Roosevelt was pursuing one of a number of extramarital affairs, in this case with distant cousin Daisy Suckley.

Suckley, played by a washed-out looking Laura Linney, narrates Hyde Park on Hudson, which begins with her being unexpectedly summoned to take tea with the 32nd president, divert him with companionable conversation and take a look at his stamp collection. "You must have met all of them," she says, looking at the images of world leaders spread before her. "Not all of them," he murmurs, as the camera rests on Hitler. "Not yet."

The air of impending cataclysm gives Hyde Park on Hudson a timely, urgent edge, and the movie is at its best when it focuses on the budding "special relationship" between the United States and England, which was given a considerable boost during that eventful visit. The film, directed with lots of circling cameras and scrumptious period detail by Roger Michell, is worth the price of admission if only for the inimitable way Olivia Williams' Eleanor Roosevelt delivers a passive-aggressively awkward curtsy upon meeting Elizabeth (Olivia Colman), or later when Roosevelt engages the stammering King George (affectingly portrayed by Samuel West) in a confiding postprandial conversation over drinks. Through a mutual love of a nightcap — not to mention shared physical hardships and the burdens of leadership — Roosevelt establishes an almost paternal relationship with the young monarch, who seems visibly to come into his own under the older man's supportive, affectionately empowering gaze.

It's the most moving sequence of Hyde Park on Hudson, which juxtaposes Roosevelt's canny handling of George with the less salutary aspects of those talents, expressed in the ways he manipulates Daisy, Eleanor and his private secretary Missy (Elizabeth Marvel). As pleasurable as it is to watch FDR parlay a simple picnic into a political tour de force (never have hot dogs figured so prominently in geopolitical negotiations), his relationships with the women in his life are far more problematic, as his affair with Daisy veers into exploitation. (Richard Nelson's script for Hyde Park on Hudson engages in its share of speculation as to how far their involvement went, inspired in part by letters and diaries discovered after Suckley died in 1991.)

The problem isn't the suggestion of FDR's dark side — that complexity, and Murray's spot-on portrayal of a man juggling myriad pressures and demands marks one of the film's greatest strengths. It's that Daisy rarely comes into her own as more than a pliant emotional helpmeet. In fact, we never quite see what he saw in her, other than the un-demanding, ever-available aide who can always be called on to "help him relax."

Upholstered in good taste, understatement and genteel reserve, Hyde Park on Hudson both celebrates and gently skewers aristocratic mores, the high-WASP art of not noticing and an ancient cultural era when love affairs and a president's polio actually could be kept secret. Precisely where the line should be drawn between appearance and reality in political stagecraft — international, domestic or intimate — is a question the film wisely leaves viewers to answer for themselves.

Lexington Herald-Leader is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service