Kentucky voices: "New Frankfort" shows government can work.

March 29, 2013 

The closing of the 2013 General Assembly at midnight Tuesday was more remarkable than its warm, gushy opening in January.

Remember January? The governor invited legislators to the mansion for dinner, making an important, if primarily symbolic gesture, toward the new legislature. Legislative leaders and the governor, speaking to more than 1,000 state business and political leaders at the Kentucky Chamber Day a few days later, declared a new atmosphere of bipartisanship and civility that would lead to real progress for Kentucky.

(Attendees were overheard taking bets on how long that campfire spirit of kumbaya would last. After all, legislative sessions are expected to devolve into political gamesmanship and/or warfare before the clock strikes midnight on the last day.)

Thirty legislative days later, we can reach conclusions based on what happened. In spite of major philosophical differences on some emotional issues and competing political agendas among key players, the bipartisan atmosphere, by and large, was sustained and produced real, measurable results.

Compromises enabled bills on public pensions, hemp, university bonding and the high school attendance age to reach the governor's desk, and those are just a few examples.

In the eyes of the business community, fixing the broken public pension system wasn't everything in this session, but it came close, representing a fundamental opportunity to get the state's financial house in order.

We've been hammering on this issue for six years. With more than $30 billion in promises made to state workers and current retirees and less than 50 cents put aside for every $1 of promises made, Kentucky's system is one of the country's worst. Our bond ratings have been downgraded, making it costlier for state and local governments to borrow money for necessary projects.

A compromise solution followed months of work last year by an interim legislative committee headed by Republican Senator Damon Thayer and then-Representative and Democrat Mike Cherry. With the help of the Pew Charitable Trust and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, a hybrid of a traditional defined benefit pension system and a modern defined contribution plan was advocated.

With bipartisan leadership in the Senate by new Senate President Robert Stivers and Minority Leader R. J. Palmer, Thayer's Senate Bill 2 passed that chamber, 33-5.

House leaders, specifically Speaker Greg Stumbo, questioned the structure of the proposed new system, but focused more on the need to find a way to pay for it.

Gov. Steve Beshear was willing to consider the hybrid, but said he wouldn't accept a plan that didn't include a way to pay for it. He wasn't going to put the costs of fixing the pension system "on the backs of our school children."

The process stalled. "We have to have reform in this session" ran up against "We have to find a way to pay for it." Our chamber of commerce stepped up outreach with a sizeable buy of radio advertising in early March on 200 radio stations, insisting that pension reform should happen in the 2013 session.

The governor convened countless meetings of legislators in his office. To some, his willingness to roll up his sleeves was a refreshing show of executive leadership on one of the toughest issues in years.

Stivers, to his credit, had pledged to set a new tone in the Senate. All indications from Republicans and Democrats is that he has fulfilled that pledge without compromising his party's principles.

Stumbo showed his political creativity by trying several times to find a funding source that was palatable to a majority of his members. The possibility of a tax increase on cigarettes, a tax on an expanded lottery and a trade-off with revenues that were flowing into the road fund were concepts that were eventually discarded. Ultimately, the governor negotiated a plan between the leaders of both chambers that garnered enough votes for the House to approve not only the pension fix, but a funding plan to pay for it.

Stumbo's late-evening speech on the House floor was brilliant for giving his members political cover for a difficult vote and for straightforwardly addressing the concerns of some of his key Democratic constituencies, namely employee unions that didn't want to see any substantial changes to the state's pension system. Most Republican House members, even those concerned about the proposed revenue measures, stepped up and supported the pension fix.

The business community, as we noted several times, would have preferred a pure 401-K. But in the realities of the business world, you don't always get all you want and are willing to settle for what will work.

In this session of the General Assembly, bipartisanship won out on the biggest issue of the day. Pragmatism and democracy prevailed. And Kentucky is better off for it.

Dave Adkisson is president and CEO of the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce.

Lexington Herald-Leader is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service