Land mines meant to deter troops still kill civilians

July 16, 2014 

For 15 years, the United States has not signed the Ottawa Treaty banning antipersonnel land mines.

Although President Barack Obama has been studying the issue for five years, his conclusion last month was not very decisive. The U. S. will no longer produce antipersonnel mines or replace expired mines and will move toward signing the treaty at some unspecified future date.

Though the policy means that America's stockpile of 10 million mines will gradually diminish, it is only a half-step toward eliminating weapons that disproportionately maim and kill civilians.

Every year, land mines kill or injure 4,000 people, half of them children — an unconscionable number, but far lower than the 26,000 land-mine injuries in 1999, the year the Mine Ban Treaty took effect.

Being party to the treaty would require the U.S. to destroy its stockpiles within four years and clear the areas it has mined in 10. The Pentagon says land mines are needed for deterrence in areas such as the Korean Demilitarized Zone, although the treaty does not affect anti-vehicular or command-detonated mines; they could remain.

Although China, Russia, Iran, Israel and Egypt have not embraced the treaty, Obama should pressure them to join him in signing, then seek Senate ratification. Land mines that kill civilians are a blight — the sooner they can be replaced with other troop deterrents, the better.

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Lexington Herald-Leader is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service