There they go again. Given control of Congress and the chance to frame an economic agenda for the middle class, the first thing Republicans do is tie themselves in knots over ... abortion and rape.
In a week when President Barack Obama used his State of the Union address to issue a progressive manifesto of bread-and-butter policy proposals, GOP leaders responded by taking up the "Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" — a bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. But a vote on the legislation had to be canceled after female GOP House members reportedly balked.
At least there are some in the party who recognize how much trouble Republicans make for themselves by breaking the armistice in the culture wars and launching battles that cannot be won. It looks as if the nation will have to stand by until GOP realists and ideologues reach some sort of understanding, which may take some time.
The "Pain-Capable" bill was never anything more than an act of political fantasy. The only purpose of the planned vote was to create an "event" that the annual anti-abortion March for Life, held Thursday in Washington, could celebrate.
Never miss a local story.
You might think the demonstrators already had reason to cheer. The abortion rate is at "historic lows," having dropped by 13 percent in the decade between 2002 and 2011, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The main reason is that there are fewer unwanted pregnancies, which suggests that the way to reduce abortion is to increase access to birth control.
More to the point, only 1.4 percent of abortions take place after 20 weeks. Thus, the bill, if it became law, would have minimal impact.
But it won't become law, as everyone in Congress knows. The White House has said Obama would veto the measure. But first, the bill would have to pass the Senate, where Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would have to win over enough Democrats to cross the 60-vote threshold, which is highly unlikely.
Theoretically, though, any reasonable-sounding anti-abortion measure should at least be able to make it through the House, with its expanded GOP majority. But even in today's far-right Republican Party, the "Pain-Capable" bill struck many House members, particularly women, as unreasonable.
At issue, apparently, is that in making exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape, the bill specifies that the rape must have been reported to law enforcement. This restriction cannot help but bring to mind the grief Republicans suffered in 2012 over Senate candidate Todd Akin's appalling attempt to distinguish between "legitimate rape" and some other kind of rape.
Reporters heard rumblings Wednesday that the bill was in trouble with moderate Republicans, especially women. Unusual numbers of female GOP House members were seen leaving the offices of the majority whip. Then the bill was pulled and a different anti-abortion measure, prohibiting federal funding for abortions, was substituted.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has said there is no legitimate research supporting the idea that fetuses feel pain at 20 weeks.
Given that the Supreme Court has said abortion is a legally protected right, the anti-abortion movement has done what it could: made abortions very difficult to obtain in some states where the pro-life position has sufficient support. Hooting and hollering on Capitol Hill do nothing for abortion opponents except fleece them of campaign contributions.
People, we are in an economic recovery whose fruits are not reaching the middle class. We have a crucial need to address U.S. infrastructure and competitiveness. We face myriad challenges abroad, including Islamic terrorism and global warming.
If a renewal of the culture wars is your answer, Republicans, you totally misheard the question.
Reach Eugene Robinson at email@example.com.
Washington Post Writers Group