Attorney General Jack Conway is right: The state Board of Education violated Kentucky's open-meetings law when an ad hoc committee it hastily created in April conducted business in unannounced, closed-session conditions while hiring a search firm to aid in finding a replacement for outgoing commissioner Terry Holliday.
Even with valid reasons, government agencies cannot legally go into closed session without first publicly citing the specific authorization for conducting the stated business outside public purview, followed by a motion and vote — again, in public — to go into closed session.
This subcommittee did neither, although it clearly was active because it narrowed the number of search firms to one. The full state education board then voted to hire Asher/Greenwood & Associates, a Florida company that also recruited Holliday to Kentucky.
Since transparency is vital to holding government agencies accountable, I sent an official complaint on behalf of the Bluegrass Institute to the board in the form of a simple two-part suggestion: the board should acknowledge its error and commit to conducting a training session for its members with an open-meetings expert from Conway's office during a regularly scheduled, webcast meeting.
Board attorney Kevin Brown sent me a letter flatly refusing to acquiesce to my uncontroversial plea, which led to the appeal.
Following release of Conway's decision, the Kentucky School Boards Association defended the state education establishment, hyperventilating in the headline of its statement: "KDE doesn't believe Attorney General's opinion impacts ongoing commissioner search process."
Perhaps. However, past open-meetings violations have resulted in courts voiding contracts, including those of contractors. It would be better for the board to comply with the ruling, perform my education remedy and put this incident in its rear-view mirror.
The KSBA irrelevantly remarked in its statement that my appeal comes from "a frequent critic of the state Department of Education and public education in Kentucky in general," as if a violation of open-meetings laws somehow doesn't matter when called out by a critic.
If the institute's goal is to degrade the department in some way, would we make such a benign request for corrective action?
The state board's argument throughout this challenge has been that its temporary committee was formed for a single task and thus could ignore the open-meetings law.
That's a weak, and ultimately losing, argument from an agency that will spend the most — $8 billion — of any state government department in the current General Fund budget.
Hiring the next leader of Kentucky's entire public-education system happens to be one of the board's most important tasks. In fact, if there's any decision that should be made with full transparency and accountability throughout the entire process, it's this one.
Reach Jim Waters at email@example.com.