The blue Trump flag, affixed “to a rear (Humvee) antenna with zip ties,” was flown on a convoy of 11 vehicles containing 12 Navy personnel, said the Department of the Navy inquiry obtained using the Freedom of Information Act. The names of the personnel were redacted in the report because disclosure would endanger the safety of personnel, the Navy said.
The flag was attached by a Navy SEAL who, according to an interview by the Department of the Navy conducted with him on Feb. 3, “made the decision to place the flag on the Humvee without discussing it with anyone in the convoy.”
“He placed it on the Humvee on Friday before departing,” the documents stated. “He did not know who owned the flag because he has bought many campaign flags for the members of his troop. He was unaware of any regulations that flying the campaign flag would have violated. (The man who attached the flag) drove home for the weekend and was not with the convoy while it transited.”
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to the Lexington Herald-Leader
The Navy SEALS group was traveling from Fort Knox to Muscatatuck Urban Training Center in Butlerville, Ind., roughly 110 miles away, the documents stated. The convoy commander, unnamed in the report, traveled with the convoy on Jan. 29 at 11 a.m. This commander was responsible for inspecting all the vehicles prior to departure and was aware the flag was on the vehicle.
“(The convoy commander) was also aware of the rules precluding Department of Defense endorsement of political candidates during an election,” the documents stated. “However, he believed that flying the flag was not inappropriate since the election was over and since the candidate was now the commander in chief of the armed forces.”
This thinking violated a longstanding Defense Department policy to avoid any activity that might imply ▪ endorsement of a political campaign, the documents stated.
About 30 minutes into the drive on I-65, the convoy commander noticed that the flag was getting a good deal of attention from civilian drivers, “some of which was negative attention.”
“At this point, he felt like the correct course of action would have been to take the flag down,” the documents stated. “However, he was concerned that it would be unsafe for the convoy and its members to pull over while on the highway.”
The preliminary inquiry officer disputed the convoy’s safety concerns, adding that “there would have been multiple opportunities to safely exit I-65 to a rest stop or gas station and remove the flag.”
The convoy decided to wait until they reached their destination before taking down the flag.
“This episode served to cast a bright and unwanted spotlight on our actions and location,” the preliminary inquiry officer said.
The convoy was also chastised for using zip ties to attach the flag because it was “unsafe and could have potentially caused an accident or collision with trailing cars had the flag become dislodged,” the report stated.
At least two videos of the flag garnered significant local and national attention, particularly from ABC, CBS and Fox News. The Department of Defense initially told the Herald-Leader that the vehicles didn’t belong to an active military unit.
Lt. Jacqui Maxwell of the Naval Special Warfare Group 2 in Virginia Beach, Va., disclosed last month that the Navy SEALS unit was punished. But details weren’t released.
According to the newly released documents, the SEALS commanding officer directed a teamwide remedial training on safe convoy operations and partisan political activity. That remedial training was completed by Feb. 9.
“It is my hope that this incident will serve as a reminder about how seemingly minor errors in judgment can have far-reaching second- and third-order effects,” the commanding officer wrote in one of the documents, “which can in turn have major implications for our command, Naval Special Warfare, and ultimately our reputation in the eyes of the country which we are sworn to protect.”