Money Research Collective’s editorial team solely created this content. Opinions are their own, but compensation and in-depth research determine where and how companies may appear. Many featured companies advertise with us. How we make money.
Could Automatic Trading Halts Stop a Stock Market Crash?
By Jordan Chussler MONEY RESEARCH COLLECTIVE
Here are the conditions that trigger an exchange’s circuit breakers.
***Money is not a client of any investment adviser featured on this page. The information provided on this page is for educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Money does not offer advisory services.***
On Monday morning, the S&P 500 briefly entered a bear market, joining the Nasdaq Composite with losses exceeding 20% from recent highs. At the time of writing, the index has recovered some of those losses but remains down 18.15% from its all-time high on Feb. 19, raising concerns about the possibility of trading halts after last week’s massive single-day losses.
Between the fallout from President Donald Trump’s tariff announcement and a general ongoing drop in investor sentiment, broad panic-selling has ensued and speculation about the use of so-called circuit breakers has resurfaced. But what are the market’s circuit breakers, and how far do stocks have to fall before they are applied?
What are circuit breakers?
Circuit breakers were implemented in the aftermath of the Black Monday stock market crash of 1987 as a means of stabilizing prices amid periods of elevated volatility and dramatic price swings. According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, these procedures allow for coordinated cross-market trading halts if a severe market price decline reaches levels that may exhaust market liquidity.
In other words, circuit breakers are used in situations when the number of buyers or sellers have been depleted as a tool to prevent further price collapses.
Also referred to as trading halts, there are three thresholds for circuit breakers to trigger:
- Level 1: Intraday trading results in a decline of 7% from the prior trading session’s close
- Level 2: Intraday trading results in a decline of 13% from the prior trading session’s close
- Level 3: Intraday trading results in a decline of 20% from the prior trading sessions’ close
Additionally, if a decline of 7% or 13% occurs before 3:25 p.m. EST, a 15-minute market-wide halt will be enacted. However, if those losses occur at or after 3:25 p.m. EST, no halt will be enacted. Any market decline that triggers a Level 3 circuit breaker — at any point in the day — will halt market-wide trading for the remainder of that trading day.
Why conditions are ripe for trading halts
Stock market volatility, as gauged by the Chicago Board Options Exchange’s CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), is currently at its highest level since Trump’s last presidency. Looking further back, the only time it has been higher in the past 20 years was during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. So when stock futures on Sunday indicated ongoing heightened volatility and looming declines at market open on Monday, rumors of trading halts were pervasive.
Why circuit breakers are hotly debated
Circuit breakers were designed to stave off rapid price changes. However, since 1987, their use has been a point of debate. In the 1987 instance, the need for stabilization came amid a massive sell-off. But more recently, trading halts have been enacted due to rapid price escalations.
During the now-famous GameStop (GME) short squeeze, retail investors looking to take advantage of short sellers targeting GME banded together, resulting in a surge of buying volume that doubled prices in just 90 minutes of trading on Feb. 24, 20201. Trading of the stock was halted by Robinhood and other brokerages twice after shares of GME surged 104%.
The event gave rise to the discussion about whether brokerages should have the right to restrict investor trading and if circuit breakers could be justified outside of the need for price stability. In the GameStop instance, retail investors alleged a conspiracy implicating Robinhood of halting trading in order to aid now-defunct hedge fund Melvin Capital, which was suffering massive losses that ultimately led to its failure.
According to the Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, “the decision to halt trading presented Robinhood as siding with the rich and taking from the poor, contracting Robinhood’s namesake and stated mission of making investing accessible to the masses,” and questions have emerged about who should shoulder the risk of meeting collateral requirements.
Circuit breakers are also seen as controversial advantages for institutional investors that enable them to better time trades after the halts expire. Critics also argue that trading halts can hinder market efficiency and lead to increased volatility after the halt is lifted.
Top Precious Metals Company on Inc. 5000
Inc. 5000 Top Gold Company with A+ BBB Rating
- Up to $25K in free silver on qualifying purchases
- Same-day IRA Processing - Start Instantly
- No Buy-Back Fees - 100% Satisfaction Guarantee: 7 Day Refund
- Free FREEDOM Package: Setup, Insured Shipping, and Secure Storage
5-star rating with the BBB & Trustpilot
Up to $20,000 in Free Metals on Qualifying Orders*
-
Free Gold IRA Setup With Expert Guidance
- 100% Low Price Guarantee
- No-Fee Buy-Back & Commission-Free Programs
- Free Shipping & Insurance on All Orders
Up to $10,000 in gold credit
Up to $15K in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase*
- Endorsed By Robert Kiyosaki, Renowned Finance Expert
- Fast, Free, Insured Shipping on Gold & Silver Purchases
- 100% No-Cost IRA Rollover With Buyback Commitment
- Two Decades of Expertise With A+ BBB Rating
Qualify for up to 10% in FREE silver
Special Offer - Get Up to 10% in Bonus Silver OR Gold
- Highest Industry Buyback Guarantee
- Winners of "Best Customer Service" and "Gold IRA Education" plus only 9X INC5000 Award Recipient
- Over 8,000 5-STAR Reviews from Google, TrustPilot, Consumer Affairs, Retirement Living and the Better Business Bureau
- Endorsed by Sean Hannity, Tom Selleck, Dennis Quaid, and Chuck Norris
More from Money:
Can Skipping Avocado Toast and Lattes Really Help You Buy a House?
‘Anything Works in a Bull Market.’ But What About a Bear Market?
Cash Isn’t King: Why Investors Shouldn’t Sideline Their Money Right Now
Since joining Money in 2023 as an investment editor, Jordan has specialized in a wealth of finance topics, ranging from traditional equities (stocks, mutual funds and ETFs), income investment vehicles and alternative assets to retirement savings, debt-based fixed-income securities and commodities, with a specific focus on gold and other precious metals. He takes pride in combining his personal interests and professional experience in finance and education to help readers increase their financial literacy and make better investment choices. Jordan has worked in digital publishing for 17 years after graduating from Lynn University as a member of both the Kappa Delta Pi International Honor Society and the U.S. Achievement Academy's All-American Scholar Program. He previously served as managing editor of Weiss Ratings, where he worked alongside a team of investment writers, editors and analysts to produce educational finance content and daily, weekly and monthly market news alerts. As a contributing writer for BetterInvesting Magazine, Jordan covered topics focused on the fundamentals of investing, technical and fundamental analysis, mutual funds, debt securities, dividend investing, retirement savings strategies and passive income generation. His bylines can also be seen in Apple News, Money Crashers, The Charlotte Observer, Fort-Worth Star Telegram and a dozen other newspapers.