Subaru Forester Vs. Toyota RAV4: Which One Is Safer?
Few safety stories are as consistent as Subaru's, and it anchors this matchup. The Forester carries one of the longest top-award streaks in the business, while its arch-rival, a freshly redesigned RAV4, has yet to face the current crash-test gauntlet. There is a clean headline here and a necessary caveat beneath it. Subaru's Forester just earned a 2026 IIHS Top Safety Pick+, extending a recognition run that stretches back roughly two decades. Toyota's RAV4 went hybrid-only and fully redesigned for 2026, and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has not yet tested the new version, leaving it without a current award. That is the tension: proven honor versus blank slate.
Safety ratings at a glance
Here is how the two compare on the ratings behind the 2026 IIHS awards, alongside their federal scores.
| Safety measure | Subaru Forester | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
IIHS 2026 award | Top Safety Pick+ | No current award (untested) |
Small overlap front | Good | Not yet tested |
Moderate overlap front (updated) | Good | Not yet tested |
Side (updated) | Good | Not yet tested |
Headlights | Acceptable or Good | Not yet tested |
Front crash prevention | Good, pedestrian, and vehicle-to-vehicle | Not yet tested |
NHTSA overall rating | 5 stars | Not yet rated |
Where each one stands with the IIHS
Subaru's Forester meets every requirement for the institute's top tier in 2026, a year when those requirements got tougher. It earns good ratings across the crash tests, clears the higher pedestrian and vehicle-to-vehicle crash-avoidance bars, and comes with acceptable or good headlights across the lineup. Subaru has now been racking up Top Safety Pick recognition for the Forester for roughly two decades, which speaks to a consistent engineering commitment rather than a one-year result.
Toyota's RAV4 is in a different situation. The previous generation performed well in IIHS testing, but the 2026 model is an all-new design with an entirely hybrid lineup, and the institute has not yet published crash results for it. That means it holds no 2026 award, not because it failed, but because it has not been evaluated. Until the IIHS tests it, its crashworthiness is genuinely unknown in the current testing regime.
Proven versus unproven
This is the heart of the comparison. Safety awards are meant to reflect measured performance, and right now only one of these two has measured performance to point to. The Forester's Top Safety Pick+ is a current, verified result against 2026 standards. The RAV4's absence from the list is a gap in data, not evidence of a weakness.
For a buyer deciding today, though, that distinction still favors the Forester. Choosing the RAV4 on safety grounds means trusting that the redesign will test well when it eventually does, whereas the Forester already has the top honor in hand. Toyota's strong safety history makes the RAV4 a reasonable bet, but a bet is not the same as a proven result.
The rest of the story
Both SUVs come loaded with standard driver-assistance technology, Subaru with its EyeSight suite and Toyota with its Safety Sense package, and both brands have solid reputations for real-world safety. Neither is a vehicle a family should worry about on those grounds. The practical takeaway is about certainty. If the RAV4 earns a strong IIHS result later in the year, this comparison could tighten considerably. As of now, only the Forester can prove where it stands.
So which one is safer?
On current, verified credentials, the Subaru Forester is safer. It holds a 2026 IIHS Top Safety Pick+, meeting the institute's toughest standards, while the redesigned Toyota RAV4 has not been crash-tested yet and therefore carries no 2026 award. The important nuance is that the RAV4's lack of a rating reflects timing rather than a poor result, and Toyota's history suggests it may well test well once evaluated. But safety is decided on evidence, and today the Forester has it while the RAV4 does not, so the Forester takes the win for now.
Copyright 2026 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This story was originally published July 18, 2026 at 12:05 PM.