Starmer expected to set out resignation timetable within days

Allies of Keir Starmer expect him to set out a timetable for his departure as U.K. prime minister in the coming days, putting Britain on course for its seventh premier in a decade and paving the way for Andy Burnham to replace him.

A statement from Starmer conceding power could come as soon as Monday, people familiar with the matter said, although they cautioned that was not certain. He spent the last three days considering his position and whether he should continue to fight attempts by Burnham, who was elected to Parliament last week, to depose him.

U.S. President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Sunday that Starmer was to resign as prime minister. A U.K. official said that nothing had been communicated to Trump from the government and he had not spoken to Starmer.

Earlier on Sunday, Business Secretary Peter Kyle said Starmer was reflecting on "political realities."

"He has been engaging conversations with a wide, wide range of people, including myself," Kyle told Sky News in an interview on Sunday. "As well as working really hard over this weekend. I think he is making time to reflect on the political realities, challenges, and opportunities that he finds himself in."

Starmer's expected decision comes days after Burnham won a parliamentary seat, making him eligible to launch a leadership challenge against the historically unpopular premier. That result led to days of discussions between Starmer and his allies over whether he could withstand a challenge from Burnham.

By the end of Friday, several cabinet ministers loyal to Starmer had indicated in conversations with him that while they didn't want him to leave, they thought it was inevitable he'd be replaced, people familiar with their thinking said.

Those conversations are characterized as focused on minimizing disruption to the country and preventing deeper infighting in Labour, rather than ministers presenting Starmer with ultimatums or threatening to resign.

By Saturday morning, only a core group of ultra-loyal cabinet members continued to argue that he should fight on.

At that point Starmer had left several cabinet ministers with the impression he'd accepted he would have to set a timetable for his departure. They also came away from their conversations believing he would choose not to stand in any leadership election. That avoided the need for more difficult discussions, one person familiar with some of the talks said.

By the middle of Saturday, the focus of Starmer's allies had turned to the terms of his departure. Some argued throughout the weekend for him to go long, setting an exit date in September, arguing that was in the country's best interests because Burnham is some way away from demonstrating he has a plan for power.

It would be up to Labour MPs to decide if Burnham should win power by a coronation or face a leadership contest, they said, though they warned of the risks of Burnham coming to power untested.

Some Labour MPs on the right of the party are concerned that even if former Health Secretary Wes Streeting can amass 81 MP supporters and force a contest, he could then try to do a deal with Burnham to concede the election early in exchange for a senior cabinet job such as foreign secretary.

A long-standing supporter of Starmer said their chief concern was that without a plan to quickly unite the party and deliver on his promise of change, within months Burnham could lose popularity and preside over even worse internal infighting than the incumbent premier, following the path of the Conservatives prior to the last general election.

There continue to be disagreements among Burnham's supporters about the direction his government would take. Some close to Burnham are opposed to appointing current Energy Secretary Ed Miliband as chancellor.

However, others on the left said they were already disappointed by Burnham's preference to keep Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood in place given her hard-line stance on immigration, and that he risked letting down that wing of the party further by not appointing a left-winger to run the Treasury.

_____

Copyright 2026 Tribune Content Agency. All Rights Reserved.

This story was originally published June 21, 2026 at 2:19 PM.