Opinion articles provide independent perspectives on key community issues, separate from our newsroom reporting.

Opinion

The real story behind the state fair board dispute | Opinion

Rep. Erika Hancock represents Kentucky’s 57th House District in Franklin County.
Rep. Erika Hancock represents Kentucky’s 57th House District in Franklin County. Kentucky General Assembly

Much has been said by Gov. Andy Beshear’s critics about the decision to replace David Beck as leader of the Kentucky State Fair Board.

But if we’re going to have an honest conversation about this controversy, let’s start where it actually began: when the legislature’s Republican supermajority approved an unconstitutional law stripping appointment authority from the governor.

In 2021, the General Assembly passed House Bill 518, removing the governor’s authority to appoint a majority of the Kentucky State Fair Board and transferring that authority to the commissioner of agriculture. The practical effect was clear: appointment authority was taken from the governor and reassigned to the commissioner of agriculture.

The Kentucky Supreme Court recently confirmed what many of us have said all along: the legislature overstepped. The court restored the governor’s authority because the Kentucky Constitution does not permit the legislature to reallocate executive appointment powers simply because it disagrees with who holds the office.

Now that the Kentucky Supreme Court has restored the governor’s constitutional appointment authority, some have wrongly characterized the actions that followed as political retaliation or even an attack on agriculture. They are neither.

The governor is exercising authority the court affirmed belongs to his office. While agriculture is one of Kentucky’s most vital industries and deserves our full support, the Kentucky State Fair Board is not solely an agriculture board. It also oversees the Kentucky Exposition Center, the Kentucky International Convention Center, the State Fair, conventions, entertainment, tourism, and economic development.

This also isn’t about whether David Beck is a good person or whether he served Kentucky well. By most accounts, he has dedicated years of service to the Commonwealth. But every governor, Republican or Democrat, must have the ability to appoint individuals who can effectively carry out the administration’s policies. That is how executive government functions.

What concerns me is the pattern behind House Bill 518. It was not an isolated incident. In recent years, the Republican supermajority has repeatedly attempted to redistribute powers the Kentucky Constitution assigns to the governor.

That same philosophy surfaced again this year during debate over House Bill 10, one of the latest efforts to shift authority away from the governor by limiting executive powers

Legislative leaders argued that because the General Assembly represents more individual districts, it is the “most powerful” branch of government. But our constitution was deliberately designed to prevent exactly that. It establishes three co-equal branches of government, each with defined responsibilities and limits. No branch is meant to dominate the others, regardless of which party is in power.

The legislature has every right to pass laws. It does not have the right to reshape the constitution whenever it becomes politically convenient.

As a legislator, I believe in a strong General Assembly. I also believe in respecting the constitutional limits of our authority. Separation of powers protects every Kentuckian by ensuring that no single branch accumulates too much control because constitutional principles must stand above party affiliation.

This debate is bigger than one appointment or one individual. It is about whether we are willing to defend the Kentucky Constitution, even when doing so benefits someone from the other political party.

I would make this same argument if a Republican governor’s authority had been stripped away. Our Constitution is not meant to expand or contract based on election outcomes.

Beshear did not create this controversy. It began when the legislature attempted to reassign appointment authority the Kentucky Constitution gives to the Governor. The Kentucky Supreme Court restored the constitutional balance.

That isn’t politics.

That’s constitutional government functioning exactly as it was intended.

Rep. Erika Hancock represents Kentucky’s 57th House District in Franklin County.

Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW