Bourbon & Bars

Troubled whiskey brand is insolvent. KY lender may foreclose on distillery

Farm Credit Mid-America of Louisville sued Nearest Green and Uncle Nearest Distillery in Tennessee, as well as founders Fawn and Keith Weaver, alleging default on $100 million in loans and seeking the appointment of a receiver to run the company. But the Weavers are opposing the move, saying they are victims of fraud.
Farm Credit Mid-America of Louisville sued Nearest Green and Uncle Nearest Distillery in Tennessee, as well as founders Fawn and Keith Weaver, alleging default on $100 million in loans and seeking the appointment of a receiver to run the company. But the Weavers are opposing the move, saying they are victims of fraud. Uncle Nearest
Key Takeaways
Key Takeaways

AI-generated summary reviewed by our newsroom.

Read our AI Policy.


  • Receiver reports Uncle Nearest insolvent, losing about $100K monthly under receivership.
  • Farm Credit may stop funding and could move to foreclose; company faces ~$164M debt.
  • Sale prospects weak: bidders value assets below secured debt; barrels lack market.

Troubled whiskey brand Uncle Nearest is insolvent, and it will likely face foreclosure if the court hands control back to founder Fawn Weaver, according to the company’s court-appointed receiver.

The details were laid out in newly unsealed documents filed late Monday in federal court in Tennessee. Receiver Phillip Young said that if his receivership is ended by U.S. District Judge Charles E. Atchley on Feb. 9, when a hearing is scheduled on the matter, and Fawn and Keith Weaver regain control, “I believe that the company’s monthly losses would be approximately $2 million per month.”

The receiver said that since he gained control in September, he’s ratcheted losses down from about $1 million a month before the receivership to about $100,000 a month now, with Kentucky lender Farm Credit covering the ongoing loss. Farm Credit also agreed to foot the bill for $1.09 million to retire a warehouse lien on Uncle Nearest’s barrels of whiskey, Young said.

The Nearest Green Distillery in Tennessee will be placed in the hands of a receiver after a federal judge ruled in favor of Farm Credit’s petition to remove Fawn and Keith Weaver from operating it for now.
The Nearest Green Distillery in Tennessee will be placed in the hands of a receiver after a federal judge ruled in favor of Farm Credit’s petition to remove Fawn and Keith Weaver from operating it for now. Uncle Nearest

He said when he took over in September, Uncle Nearest was unable to cover its $450,000 payroll except with a loan from the payroll processing company, repaid by advances from Farm Credit.

But if the receivership, which was requested by Farm Credit after Uncle Nearest defaulted on more than $100 million in loans last fall, is ended, “I believe that Farm Credit would immediately cease covering these operational losses and move to foreclose on and repossess its collateral,” according to an affidavit by Young.

The Weavers have yet to file a response; they must refile documents previously submitted in support of their motion to oust the receiver on or before Feb. 5.

But overnight, Fawn Weaver said, in an email sent to investors and employees that was obtained by the Herald-Leader, that she plans to answer all the assertions made by the receiver. “I want to be absolutely clear. Neither Keith nor I have ever personally gained anything monetarily from Uncle Nearest,” Fawn Weaver said.

The Tennessee-based whiskey and bourbon brand, which Weaver has previously said is worth more than a billion dollars, has seen sales plummet, and Weaver has blamed the receiver in her motion to regain control.

What happens if Fawn Weaver regains Uncle Nearest

But the receiver said financial analysts believe that even if sales increased as Weaver has projected, the company will still lose almost $10 million between January and the end of May.

Farm Credit Mid-America of Louisville sued Nearest Green and Uncle Nearest Distillery in Tennessee, as well as founders Fawn and Keith Weaver, alleging default on more than $100 million in loans and seeking the appointment of a receiver to run the company. But the Weavers are opposing the move, saying they are victims of fraud.
Farm Credit Mid-America of Louisville sued Nearest Green and Uncle Nearest Distillery in Tennessee, as well as founders Fawn and Keith Weaver, alleging default on more than $100 million in loans and seeking the appointment of a receiver to run the company. But the Weavers are opposing the move, saying they are victims of fraud. Uncle Nearest

If Farm Credit pulls its support, according to receiver, Uncle Nearest will immediately be on the hook for about $164 million in debt, including nearly $22 million in debts to vendors and $4.1 million to WhistlePig, among others. Uncle Nearest also apparently owes more than $10 million to Advanced Sprits, which purchased barrels of whiskey from Uncle Nearest that the company is required to repurchase at higher prices.

“Furthermore, based upon correspondence I have had during this receivership, I anticipate that the company would immediately be the defendant in dozens of suits by creditors and shareholders across the country,” the receiver said.

Receiver wants to expand scope

Instead, Young has now formally asked for the judge to expand the receivership to include seven related business entities, citing millions in transfers and payments between them and Uncle Nearest. Young said based on the incomplete bank and financial records he has seen, the businesses were essentially operating as one company.

Putting them all under the receivership would allow him to reconcile some puzzling financial anomalies including a complex transaction that he referred to as “the Grant Sidney deal” in which $20 million in loans moved between Uncle Nearest to Weaver’s Grant Sidney company and then back again.

In her email, Fawn Weaver denied there was anything concerning about the $20 million transfer and denied that the receiver had ever asked for records of the transaction.

“The $20 million dollars referenced in the receiver’s filing came from me selling my personal shares, with 100% of the proceeds invested directly into Uncle Nearest,” Weaver said. “Not a single penny was kept by me. That infusion is why the company had substantial cash on hand at the end of Q1 2025.”

She did not address why the company need the cash infusion, except to say that following the departure of CFO Mike Senzaki, whom the Weavers have sued, they learned the company owned $2 million to its payroll company and repaid it.

Weaver also said that to cover their ongoing legal expenses, she and husband Keith Weaver are selling all but one of their non-Uncle Nearest real estate assets, including their personal residence.

It isn’t clear what these assets include; the Weavers have fought to keep out of the receivership some assets that the receiver now says should be included and might be sold to pay off Uncle Nearest’s debts.

Why Uncle Nearest hasn’t sold

As for a potential sale, Young said as his behest Arlington Capital had communicated with 100 parties about refinancing the debt with no qualified source willing to refinance even Farm Credit’s secured debt. About 40 parties were interested in an asset purchase and examined Uncle Nearest financials.

From those 40 parties, they received 12 formal, written letters of interest with a proposed price.

“Except for NexGen 2780 ... no party offered a valuation in excess of the amount of the secured debt,” Young said. “While Arlington continues to work with several bidders to commit to a written, binding offer that is deemed acceptable, no offer currently exists that would indicate the company is balance sheet solvent.”

As for NexGen’s unusual offer, Young said, “in which they propose to pay $108 million ... it is unclear to me whether that proposal is for a purchase of the assets, a purchase of the company or a refinancing of the debt. It is not a formal offer and remains subject to due diligence.”

Young and Arlington have not be able to confirm the source of reliability of their finances, he said. Young said emails in the Uncle Nearest system indicated that Chuck Speed, who was associated with NexGen, has a prior relationship with Weaver.

The receiver said he initially was optimistic about a sale, in part because Uncle Nearest had reported $75 million in revenues for 2024, “and there seemed to be excitement about the Uncle Nearest brand.”

But his accounting team determined the actual revenues were only $41 million and 2025 revenues are expected to be less than $25 million, he said.

Also, “I began receiving feedback from creditors, shareholders, and new potential investors that the constant media coverage of Uncle Nearest, and the Weaver Parties’ participation in that media coverage, was damaging the market’s view of the brand’s viability,” the receiver said.

Nearest Green founder and CEO of Uncle Nearest Fawn Weaver posted an online rebuttal to the allegations in a lawsuit filed by a Kentucky lender seeking to have a receiver appointed for the distillery.
Nearest Green founder and CEO of Uncle Nearest Fawn Weaver posted an online rebuttal to the allegations in a lawsuit filed by a Kentucky lender seeking to have a receiver appointed for the distillery.

As the worldwide bourbon and whiskey market “went into freefall in the third and fourth quarters of 2025, with multiple bourbon brands filing for bankruptcy protection, others liquidating, others listing their bourbon businesses for sale, and others (including Jim Beam) announcing a cessation of distilling operations ... this created a glut in the market such that the company’s assets were no longer attractive,” Young said.

Although now is not a good time to sell, Young said in a footnote, “in my opinion, a sale in the next six months is the only viable option to maximize the value of the company and its assets.”

Young also said he believes some of the assets are worth far less than the Weavers have said. A property in Martha’s Vineyard, bought by Uncle Nearest, is worth less than $2.6 million, not the $4 million that the Weavers claim, he said. He recently listed it for $2,595,000, he said. (In another filing, Young noted that the Weavers are now attempting to claim that the property actually belongs to Keith Weaver, but he dismissed this claim, saying it was purchased with Farm Credit funds and Uncle Nearest has been paying all the bills, including property taxes.)

And the approximately 56,000 barrels of whiskey that Uncle Nearest owns are not worth the $78 million — about $1,400 a barrel — that the Weavers have valued them, he said. Young said he attempted to sell 10,000 barrels at $1,000 each and received no offers.

“The only offers the receiver has received for the company’s barrel stock was an offer of approximately $400 per barrel, for less than 1,000 barrels,” he said.

Young also cited the finding of the Texas bankruptcy judge overseeing the Stoli/Kentucky Owl case, who “recently found that barrels of bourbon less than four years old currently have virtually no value because there is no market for young bourbon. ... The vast majority of (Uncle Nearest’s) barrels contain whiskey that was distilled less than four years ago.”

Young said his preference would be to reorganize the company and refinance it, but they have not found a lender who will take on the company’s debts. He said that although Fawn Weaver has indicated she has a potential refinancing source, she has not provided any details.

“To be clear, I certainly have no objection to allowing an acquaintance of Ms. Weaver’s to provide refinancing and leaving the company intact,” Young said. “Indeed, that’s my preference.”

However, Young also made it clear that he views his investigation of how Uncle Nearest got into this situation as still ongoing and that no one — not Fawn Weaver nor lender Farm Credit — has been deemed “cleared” of wrongdoing.

In his second quarterly report, Young said he has identified “a number of very questionable transactions in 2024 and 2025 involving officers and directors of the Company.” But he said pursuing them before a sale is likely to drive the price down even further.

In a discovery “of particular concern, Young revealed that Uncle Nearest has not paid federal taxes since 2018. He said he is working with authorities to address the situation. There also may be issues with state-level taxes, although he said the company is now caught up.

The receiver said he also had determined that the company’s capitalization table is “inaccurate.” In his affidavit, Young went on to say he had begun reconciling the ownership structure using documents provided by shareholders because the company’s records are incomplete.

Young said he’d identified the cognac house in France early on as an asset that could be sold without interfering with Uncle Nearest’s business. Fawn Weaver told him she had a potential buyer for $10 million, but when the receiver contacted them, the buyer brought the offer down to $7 million then backed out entirely.

Young said he believes the buyer backed out at Weaver’s behest once she learned he intended to use the proceeds to pay down company debt rather than using the money to artificially inflate Uncle Nearest’s balance sheets.

“The receiver believes that Ms. Weaver intended to use the proceeds from the sale of the French assets as “proof” of the solvency of the company,” he said. “After this failed transaction, the receiver reduced the expenses associated with the French assets as much as possible and is currently utilizing a European connection to market the Cognac assets.”

The receiver said the relationship with the Weavers has become so adversarial due to their recent filings that he no longer communicates one-on-one with them, but only with counsel present for both sides, and only directly with the Weavers through his consultants. He also indicated he began limited some information going to Fawn Weaver after she would not sign a non-disclosure agreement.

In conclusion of the quarterly report, the receiver said he believes Uncle Nearest has a future but that it would be forced to close within 60 days without the support of Farm Credit and the guidance of the receivership, with liquidation of non-essential assets and sale as a going concern no later than the second quarter of 2026.

“The cessation of business would cause the loss of nearly 70 jobs and the disappearance of a brand with significant social and cultural value,” the receiver said.

Read Next
Read Next
Read Next
Read Next
Read Next

This story was originally published February 3, 2026 at 8:19 AM.

Related Stories from Lexington Herald Leader
Janet Patton
Lexington Herald-Leader
Janet Patton covers restaurants, bars, food and bourbon for the Herald-Leader. She is an award-winning business reporter who also has covered agriculture, gambling, horses and hemp. Support my work with a digital subscription
Get one year of unlimited digital access for $159.99
#ReadLocal

Only 44¢ per day

SUBSCRIBE NOW