That night, who would have dreamed that, eight years later, Duke and Coach K would be fully immersed in one-and-done culture?
Yet starting with Kyrie Irving in 2011, Duke has sent at least one one-and-done player into every NBA Draft except for 2013.
In 2015, the Blue Devils delivered three one-and-dones to the NBA. Last year, Duke had two one-year players chosen in the draft. With big men Marvin Bagley III and Wendell Carter plus point guard Trevon Duval, the current Blue Devils roster may boast three one-and-done freshmen.
Obviously, Duke has made the competition at the very top of the market for college basketball talent far more challenging for UK.
In each of his first six Kentucky recruiting classes, Calipari signed at least one player ranked in the top six of his class by Rivals. Cal inked multiple players ranked among the top five prospects of their classes in 2009 (two), 2011 (three) and 2013 (two).
However, over UK’s past three recruiting classes, 2016-18, Kentucky has not signed any top-five prospects. In the 2017 and ’18 (so far) classes combined, UK has added only one top 10-ranked player. Current Cats freshman forward Kevin Knox was rated No. 10 in 2017.
Duke, meanwhile, has now signed at least one top five-ranked prospect six years in a row.
In its last three recruiting classes, Duke has signed the No. 2 (Harry Giles) and No. 3 (Jayson Tatum) prospects in 2016; the No. 2 (Marvin Bagley III), No. 5 (Trevon Duval) and No. 7 (Wendell Carter) players in 2017; and the No. 1 (R.J. Barrett), No. 2 (Cameron Reddish) and No. 8 (Tre Jones) players for 2018.
For those of you who live and die on every recruiting battle, what follows will sound bizarrely counterintuitive, but Duke’s full-scale success in working the one-and-done market has not been all bad for Kentucky.
Once Krzyzewski, with his exalted reputation for probity, went all in on one-and-dones, it essentially shut down the “Kentucky is killing college basketball” narrative in the national media.
With No. 3-ranked prospect Zion Williamson of Spartanburg, S.C., widely projected to pick home-state Clemson over UK when he announces Jan. 20, there has been ample consternation locally over Kentucky’s inability to land a perceived elite prospect in the class of 2018.
Yet, given the optics around college basketball this year as a result of the FBI investigation into financial improprieties in the world of men’s hoops recruiting, this is not the worst time to have a well-publicized recruiting miss or two.
For those Kentucky fans suffering from “one-and-done fatigue” and who profess to being tired of having to learn a whole new cast every year, the way UK has recruited the past two seasons could — emphasis on could — lead to more returning players in future years.
That might even lead to better Kentucky teams.
It remains very much up for debate whether rosters built around a revolving door of one-and-done freshmen are the best way to win NCAA Tournament games.
Since Duke got on the one-and-done train, its NCAA tourney performance has been wildly uneven. Behind one-and-doners Jahlil Okafor, Justise Winslow and Tyus Jones, the Blue Devils won the 2015 NCAA title.
That matches the one NCAA crown (2012) UK has won since embracing one-and-dones.
Overall, however, in the seven NCAA Tournaments since Duke started regularly using one-and-done players, the Blue Devils have also lost in the round of 64 twice, the round of 32 once and in the round of 16 twice — and made only the one Final Four trip.
Duke’s current roster, packed with freshmen stars, has the highest talent ceiling in men’s college basketball.
Yet if the Blue Devils — No. 94 in the kenpom.com ratings in adjusted defensive efficiency — don’t improve at stopping people, another early tournament exit is at least possible for the unexpected new kings of the one-and-done.